Jasmine was thrilled to land her dream starter home in Des Moines’ Drake neighborhood. Fresh out of Iowa State and eager to settle near her new job, she thought her future was secure after a friendly handshake and a $5,000 earnest deposit, even without a signed contract. A week later, her excitement turned to panic. The seller received a better offer and tried to back out, leaving Jasmine at risk of losing both her savings and the home she had already begun to picture as her own.
In Iowa, can a verbal promise and a handshake really bind a real estate deal? Jasmine’s story is a common one, and the answer lies in a critical state law known as the Statute of Frauds and its important exceptions. Without understanding these rules, anyone can find their real estate dreams in jeopardy.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Jasmine’s situation highlights a tough reality: without a written contract, she could lose her $5,000 and the opportunity to live near her new job. She is not alone. Handshake deals happen all the time in Iowa, affecting a wide range of people, from first-time buyers eager to move fast in a competitive market to rural landowners making informal family arrangements over coffee. Commercial investors looking to close quickly may also trust a seller’s word, only to face complications later.
The stakes are high for everyone. Financial losses can be devastating, especially for young buyers and retirees. Property rights can become tangled, leading to bitter family disputes or the collapse of business relationships. Whether you are buying your first home, inheriting land, or investing in rental property, a missing signature can lead to heartbreak and significant legal headaches.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
The heart of Iowa’s rule is the Statute of Frauds. Found in Iowa Code § 622.32(3), this law requires that any contract to transfer an interest in land must be in writing and signed by the party against whom it is being enforced. This means that, as a general rule, oral agreements for real estate transactions are not legally binding. However, Iowa law recognizes that strict application of this rule can lead to unfair results, so it provides several important exceptions.
One key exception, outlined in Iowa Code § 622.33, is partial payment. If a buyer has paid any portion of the purchase price, as Jasmine did with her $5,000 deposit, a court may enforce the agreement. Another exception applies if the buyer takes possession of the property with the seller’s consent. Additionally, an oral agreement may be enforceable if the party being sued does not deny the contract's existence in their court pleadings, as specified in Iowa Code § 622.34.
Beyond these statutes, courts may step in to prevent injustice using legal doctrines. Under the principle of promissory estoppel, a deal may be enforced if one party made a clear promise that the other reasonably relied on to their detriment, as established in Kolkman v. Roth. Finally, the doctrine of partial performance can validate an oral agreement if a buyer takes clear actions that prove the contract’s existence, such as making substantial improvements to the property with the seller's knowledge, a principle supported by cases like Gardner v. Gardner. These exceptions provide potential remedies when a handshake deal goes wrong.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Jasmine’s $5,000 payment is her lifeline. Under Iowa Code § 622.33, her attorney can argue that the deposit constitutes partial payment, potentially forcing the seller to honor the agreement or at least return her money. Her case would be even stronger if she had also moved in or made improvements.
Consider a rural landowner like Mrs. Sorensen, who verbally agrees to sell the family farm to her nephew. If he moves onto the land and begins planting crops with her blessing, his actions may qualify as taking possession with consent, giving him a strong argument to enforce the deal.
Now, think of Abby, an entrepreneur who shakes hands on a downtown storefront and immediately begins renovations with the seller’s approval. If she can show she invested significant money and labor based on their agreement, an Iowa court may view this as partial performance, another powerful exception to the Statute of Frauds. These exceptions are specific and not guaranteed to succeed.
Urban buyers like Jasmine face different risks than rural landowners or commercial investors. Family deals often rely on trust but can lead to bitter disputes if not documented.
Out-of-state investors, like Darius from Chicago, might wire a large down payment and assume they are protected, only to discover that Iowa law requires more than just good faith. Cultural expectations around verbal agreements vary, but the legal consequences are the same: without a written contract, your rights are on shaky ground.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Iowa has a long tradition of trust and handshake deals, especially in rural communities and family transactions. However, this cultural norm does not override the legal requirement for a written contract. In fast-moving urban markets like Des Moines, the pressure to act quickly can tempt even experienced buyers and sellers to rely on verbal promises. State laws like Iowa Code § 622.32 and § 622.33 are designed to prevent disputes by demanding clear, written terms.
As Jasmine’s story shows, a missing signature can leave you exposed, no matter how trustworthy the other party seems. Understanding these local nuances is essential to protect your interests in any Iowa property deal, whether it involves a farm in Shelby County or a duplex in Cedar Rapids.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
If you find yourself in a situation involving a disputed oral agreement, you should act quickly. Gather all written communications, including texts and emails, along with receipts and any other evidence of payment or performance. It is critical to consult a real estate attorney to explore your options under Iowa Code § 622.33 and related legal doctrines. Be aware of red flags, such as pressure to make large payments without a contract or taking possession of a property based only on a handshake.
Ultimately, prevention is the best strategy. Always insist on a comprehensive written agreement that is signed by both parties before you exchange money or take any action related to the property. A real estate agent can play a vital role in educating you about these risks and ensuring all documentation is handled correctly. In Iowa real estate, proper paperwork is not just a formality—it is your primary protection.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
With her attorney’s help, Jasmine may be able to recover her deposit or even enforce the sale, thanks to Iowa’s exception for partial payment. Regardless of the outcome, she has learned a lasting lesson: written contracts are not just formalities but essential safeguards for everyone involved in a real estate transaction. From first-time buyers to seasoned investors, and from rural families to urban entrepreneurs, no one should let their dreams depend on a handshake.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Disclaimer: The names and specific details in the stories and scenarios presented in this blog post are fictitious and have been created for illustrative purposes. However, these stories are based on real-life situations and legal issues that commonly occur in Iowa real estate transactions.
Any resemblance to actual persons, living or deceased, or actual events is purely coincidental. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.